W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2016

Re: w3process-ISSUE-176 (charter-process-substantive-changes): Substantive changes undefined for Charter and Process reviews [Process Document]

From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 09:35:40 +0100
To: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-Id: <260581481963740@webcorp01d.yandex-team.ru>
I'm not sure that the solution is to change the section on changes to define it for more than technical specifications - instead, I think we should be clearer about what sort of changes to charters require review.

I agree that there is a problem to be solved here.

cheers

16.12.2016, 16:21, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>:
> w3process-ISSUE-176 (charter-process-substantive-changes): Substantive changes undefined for Charter and Process reviews [Process Document]
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/176
>
> Raised by: Daniel Glazman
> On product: Process Document
>
> I think we miss something in section 7.1
>
> 7.1.2 item 2 links to "substantive changes" in section 6.2.5 but the
> list there refers to technical documents only.
>
> "Substantive changes" is then undefined for Charter review or even for
> Process review.
>
> In the missing definition, and following a recent event that deeply
> shocked me, I think we need to categorize "changes that impact the
> internal process of the Group" as changes beyond "substantive" and
> falling into 7.1.2 item 3, "returned for additional work".

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - standards - Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Saturday, 17 December 2016 08:36:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 17 December 2016 08:36:17 UTC