W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Comments on Process 2016 (3 August 2016 Editor's Draft)

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:16:18 -0500
Cc: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F3C1A3D4-2D13-485C-97C8-8CF25340FE86@w3.org>
To: David Singer <singer@mac.com>

> On Aug 8, 2016, at 6:46 PM, David Singer <singer@mac.com> wrote:
> 
[snip]
> 
> I don’t think reversing a rescinsion is that easy at all.  We may, as a community, have taken steps consequent on something being rescinded and knowing it can’t get new licenses.  The licensors may have taken steps knowing that they cannot be asked to grant new licenses.  And so on.
> 
> I fear reversing rescinsion is not as simple as reversing obsoletion.

+1 to hearing legal perspectives on this (e.g., any other orgs do this?)

Ian


--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447




Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2016 00:16:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 9 August 2016 00:16:25 UTC