W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > April 2016

RE: Updated proposal: Adopting STV for TAG/AB elections

From: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:56:25 +0000
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BY1PR02MB11146A28CF5A90B8E5DFCD21AE620@BY1PR02MB1114.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Ian,
I believe that you have correctly implemented the results of this morning's discussion.

I would, however, suggest one change:

OLD: When there is a vote, each Member (or group of related Members) is invited to rank candidates in order of preference.

NEW: When there is a vote, each Member (or group of related Members) is invited to submit one ballot that ranks the candidates the Member finds acceptable  in preference order.

My goal here is to identify the "ballot" is specifying the ranking order and to get David Singers "you find acceptable" into the statement. The last bit is just English preference and not so important that you really need to make a change. I could also live with "a ballot" instead of "one ballot".

Steve Z

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 9:32 AM
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Subject: Updated proposal: Adopting STV for TAG/AB elections

Dear Process CG,

Based on suggestions from some in this task force, I have updated:

  Voting2016
  https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/wiki/Voting2016

Comments welcome,

Ian

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 25 April 2016 17:56:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 25 April 2016 17:56:55 UTC