W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2015

Re: [Issue-101] Replacement for one of the diagrams in the Process document

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:45:01 -0700
Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-id: <331AB30C-258F-438E-A65E-079E0F2A875D@apple.com>
To: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Hi

The phrase ‘[very] substantive changes required’ should be ‘[very] substantive changes’ maybe with ‘occurred’ appended.

we’re trying to document what events permit or trigger a state transition.

so ‘wide review’ should be ‘widely reviewed’
‘interoperable implementation’ needs an ’s’ (can one implementation be interoperable? what is the sound of one hand clapping?)

> On Oct 5, 2015, at 18:09 , Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:42:18 -0400, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
> > Editorial:
> > 
> >> 1. Please provide a diagram showing for each state what the condition  
> >> of the document is (stable, possibly unimplemented, for CR, for  
> >> example), and for each transition, what the triggering condition is to  
> >> take it (not the actions; e.g. WD->CR, WG believes it is ready for  
> >> implementation)
>  
> This became ISSUE-101
>  
> A proposed, revised replacement for diagram in sections 6.1.1 of the 2015 Process Document
>   http://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#recs-and-notes
> is attached. 
>  
> Comments are welcome
>  
> Steve Z
>  
> <Maturity Levels Diagram - 3.svg>

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2015 19:45:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 October 2015 19:45:32 UTC