W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > March 2015

Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review.

From: Olle Olsson <olleo@sics.se>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:01:19 +0100
Message-ID: <550BFDFF.1070007@sics.se>
To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 2015-03-19 22:57, David Singer wrote:
> .......
>> For that list of decisions after AC Review that can be appealed, the only exclusion not allowing appeal should be approval of the proposal without substantive change with no AC Review dissent (formal objection).  i.e. everyone agreed and nothing changed so even though its in the list, no appeal in that case.
> And indeed if a re-review is requested, you can’t now comment on unchanged material!
A change somewhere that seems to be local may  actually influence how 
other unchanged text will be interpreted. If someone accepted that other 
text in its original formulation, they might reject it after a change is 
done somewhere else.
> .....
> David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. 


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Olle Olsson   olleo@sics.se   Tel: +46 8 633 15 19  Fax: +46 8 751 72 30
         [Svenska W3C-kontoret: olleo@w3.org]
SICS [Swedish Institute of Computer Science]
Box 1263
SE - 164 29 Kista
Sweden
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 11:01:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 20 March 2015 11:01:49 UTC