W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > March 2015

[Issue-152] 2nd draft Note for Draft Process Document

From: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 18:04:06 +0000
To: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN1PR0201MB0802C76F009ADFF58E9F5F69AE110@BN1PR0201MB0802.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Per the request of the Advisory Board, the following note is proposed for attachment to the second paragraph of section 7.7.2 Revising a Recommendation<http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#revised-rec> to explain the only open issue on the current draft of Process2015. [The proposed text has been hyperlinked inline to make it easier to copy.]

Steve Z

======NOTE=======
Issue: Issue-152<http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/152> concerns a change made in Process2014<http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#revised-rec> that requires Edited Recommendations consisting solely of "editorial changes" to go through an additional step, publication as a Proposed Recommendation, prior to publication as a Recommendation. There are two aspects of this issue: (1) whether "editorial change" is sufficiently well defined that it can be validate by a simple process (as it was in Process2005<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/>) and (2) whether patent licensing considerations should require all potential Recommendations to have a Call for Exclusions on their content. See the issue entry<http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/152> and its associated notes and emails for additional detail on the discussion.
=====END NOTE========
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 18:04:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 3 March 2015 18:04:41 UTC