W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > July 2015

Re: Charter / Process failure - Was: Re: FPWD: Discovery & Registration of Multimodal Modality Components: State Handling

From: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:10:06 +0200
To: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>, "Wayne Carr" <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Philippe Le H├ęgaret <plh@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.x1i064jysvvqwp@sith.local>
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 23:04:22 +0200, Wayne Carr  
<wayne.carr@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 2015-07-07 06:06, timeless wrote:
[...]
>> I have a few asks:
>> 1. Can we ask that Charters include a `Start Date` along with an `End  
>> Date`?
>
> I've asked for this too.  It can be very difficult to figure out how  
> long a Charter was in effect.  There should be a start date, the  
> original expiration date and an extension date if it is extended beyond  
> the initial expiration.
>
> Currently, to try to find that you have to hunt through text for links  
> and it isn't always possible.  It should be clear in the header how long  
> it has been since the AC and Director Review of the Charter.
>
>
>> 2. Can the Start/End Date section also include a `Previous Charter`
>> link? -- currently it's buried in Charter Prose.
>
> +1

Thanks Josh and Wayne (Wayne, I had seen your feedback on w3c-ac-forum, as  
well),

I'll write back with a reply after internal discussion.

Coralie

[...]


-- 
Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Marketing & Communications -  http://www.w3.org
mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2015 22:10:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 9 July 2015 22:10:16 UTC