public-w3process@w3.org from February 2015 by thread

[Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document Stephen Zilles (Saturday, 28 February)

RESOLUTION: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 Stephen Zilles (Tuesday, 24 February)

Agenda Process Document Task Force 24 February 2015 Stephen Zilles (Tuesday, 24 February)

Agenda Process Document Task Force 24 February 2015 Stephen Zilles (Tuesday, 24 February)

Cancelled: Process Document Task Force Telcon for 17 February Stephen Zilles (Tuesday, 17 February)

w3process-ISSUE-158 (New or continued WG?): Does rechartering extinguish a WG or continue it? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 12 February)

w3process-ISSUE-157 (editorial CR revision): Requirements for republishing a CR with non-substantive changes [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 12 February)

Should there be a Public Channel for AC Review Comments (was ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154) Stephen Zilles (Monday, 9 February)

Re: Advisory Board Will Review of the Current Editor's Draft of Process2015 on February 12, 2015 fantasai (Sunday, 8 February)

ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 Stephen Zilles (Sunday, 8 February)

List of Issue in the Revising the W3C Process Tracket that are Not Currently viewed as being In Scope for the Process Document TF Stephen Zilles (Sunday, 8 February)

List of Process Document Issue Not Currently Covered in the Process 2015 Draft being reviewed Stephen Zilles (Sunday, 8 February)

w3process-ISSUE-156 (Errata vs REC track process): Do we need separate Errata and REC Track Processes? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 8 February)

w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 7 February)

Process Document TF Telcons for 2/3 and 2/10 are cancelled Stephen Zilles (Monday, 2 February)

Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] chaals@yandex-team.ru (Sunday, 1 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2015 23:59:10 UTC