W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > February 2015

Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document]

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:41:23 -0800
Cc: "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <michael.champion@microsoft.com>, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-id: <897DCFFB-CFE5-40C7-941D-7DD5B04FB462@apple.com>
To: chaals@yandex-team.ru

> On Jan 31, 2015, at 18:24 , chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
> 
> 30.01.2015, 22:45, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>:
>>>  Does there need to be a default channel?
>> 
>> What problem does the default channel cause that would be worth even a tiny amount of effort to fix?
> 
> Someone might ask why there is a default channel that isn't respected in practice. Or why W3C doesn't follow it's own process - and someone might waste time trying to justify what happens.
> 
> The tiny amount of effort required is in fact smaller than explaining it, so we have now expanded the necessary work.

I’m lost.  When I do a review, there is an option at the top, which seems to have a different default than the one you say, but maybe that’s a bug:



I agree that we should normally conduct our business member-visible, so I think the form is right in this default.  Is that the question, that we should align the process and practice?


> 
> cheers
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
>> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:23 AM
>> To: public-w3process@w3.org
>> Subject: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document]
>> 
>> w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/154
>> 
>> Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile
>> On product: Process Document
>> 
>> This should be a tiny issue, so I hope we can resolve it in passing.
>> 
>> In section 8.1.1 on AC reviews it says [1] [[[The Team must provide two channels for Advisory Committee review comments:
>> 
>>   +  an archived Team-only channel; this is the default channel for reviews.
>>  ]]]
>> 
>> Does there need to be a default channel?
>> 
>> I would suggest not, others have suggested it is helpful - and others have suggested it is helpful if it is to publish it to the world.
> 
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 18:42:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 February 2015 18:42:10 UTC