- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:14:35 +0300
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 16/04/15 11:20, David Singer wrote: > I find the arguments for relaxing beyond the next election not as strong as those for relaxing up to the next election. That's where I am 100% in opposition. I find the arguments saying someone who was elected by AC vote not in capacity to finish a mandate unacceptable. I hve a compromise proposal: allow people to finish their mandate but allow only one vote per Member in TAG's official decisions. That way, we don't touch elections, we don't touch mandates, and you still keep your "security". It's also simpler and cleaner. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 09:15:01 UTC