W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > April 2015

Re: process.next wish list

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:31:35 +0200
Cc: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>, W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-id: <B33D375C-FC40-4383-B10C-F6EB4EFF76B0@apple.com>
To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>

> On Apr 15, 2015, at 11:03 , Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> But I think that we need to get much better at our practices before we make this rule change. Itís deplorable, but at the moment groups Ďrun off the end of the pierí, let their charter expire, and only then start worrying about renewing it. If we were to introduce this rule today, when charter expiry is all too common, chaos and panic would ensue. I donít want to be in the position of the forced closure of a WG that we all agree should have been re-chartered and still operating. That would be Ö embarrassing.
> 
> Maybe where a group is "just" late, and has not for example actually taken on a wider scope of work, then the rechartering should be quick and easy.

Totally agree.  We should be able to process a new charter pretty simply and quickly if all that has happened is a change of milestone dates (and there is some accompanying material explaining whatís going on).



David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.



Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 09:32:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 15 April 2015 09:32:29 UTC