W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > April 2015

RE: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"

From: Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:33:11 +0000
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Daniel Appelquist <appelquist@gmail.com>
CC: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BLUPR03MB488043E366563534A74F04197E60@BLUPR03MB488.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
> I would also be happy to adopt 2 and move on...

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 11:12 AM
To: Daniel Appelquist
Cc: public-w3process@w3.org
Subject: Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"


> On Apr 14, 2015, at 19:32 , Daniel Appelquist <appelquist@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Frankly, I think we starting to split hairs here. I sincerely hope we can choose a consensus view (2 or 2.1) and move on with our lives.

Yes.  I agree.

Sadly, I think that Chaals has a formal objection—  that 2 goes too far unless other changes are made (which he detailed in a separate email).  Glazou seems to feel that it doesn’t go far enough, and he comes across more strongly than you on this (though whether it rises to formal objection I don’t know).

(Hence my comment about being shot at from both sides).

I would also be happy to adopt 2 and move on...

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2015 19:33:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 14 April 2015 19:33:40 UTC