W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"

From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:22:50 -0400
Message-ID: <552BED5A.6070509@w3.org>
To: chaals@yandex-team.ru, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>


On 4/13/2015 4:39 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
> For what it's worth, I think this background framing is pretty 
> inaccurate :(

It is also not my recollection of what we decided in the CG call.  I 
thought we were going to ask the AB (in their role as managing the 
process document) what document (and/or alternatives) would go into the 
final call.

> 13.04.2015, 00:44, "Stephen Zilles" <szilles@adobe.com>:
>>
>> The Process Document Task Force held a Call for Consensus (CfC) [1] 
>> to change the TAG participation rules in Process 2015. The result of 
>> this call [2] was positive in favor of the change (see below).
>>
> With some exceptions…
>>
>> [1] 
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0163.html
>>
>> [2] 
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Dec/0036.html
>>
>> Yandex, via Chaals, objected [3] to this change and has proposed [4] 
>> an alternative set of changes to the TAG. With one exception, there 
>> was not a lot of support for these changes in the discussion that 
>> took place, both on this list and on the AC-Forum list.
>>
>> [3] 
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Mar/att-0101/00-part
>>
>> [4] 
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Mar/0029.html
>>
> For the most part there was little dissent - a couple of points 
> attracted some dissent.
>>
>> Chaals has indicated [5] that he does not have another solution to 
>> finding a change that would satisfy both Yandex and the proposers of 
>> the change to TAG participation that is currently in the Draft 
>> Process 2015 document, but he indicated that if this is what the AC 
>> wants he could probably live with the change.
>>
> I did not indicate the latter, and I am not sure where in those 
> minutes you conclude that I did…
>>
>> He suggested balloting the AC to determine their desires.
>>
>> [5] http://www.w3.org/2015/04/07-w3process-minutes.html 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2015/04/07-w3process-minutes.html>
>>
> Yes.
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Monday, 13 April 2015 16:22:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 16:22:56 UTC