W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > April 2015

RE: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]

From: Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:37:52 +0000
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
CC: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BLUPR03MB4881608D8A4EBC7FFCB640497FE0@BLUPR03MB488.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Agree, I would rather rely on automation than process.  Maybe the PD should just say that the team setup and maintain an automated mechanism to inform people of
FPWD
LCWD
Transition requests/Transitions
Exclusion opportunities

... in  channel that doesn't have anything else on it.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 3:33 PM
To: Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
Cc: chaals@yandex-team.ru; Arthur Barstow; Phillips, Addison; public-w3process@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org
Subject: Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]


> On Apr 6, 2015, at 15:24 , Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Actually, I believe there is one.  Trouble is few use it.  

has to be automatic for all the obvious events

FPWD
LCWD
Transition requests/Transitions
Exclusion opportunities
Incoming liaisons, maybe

> Does the Process Doc have to mandate it as the mechanism to inform the world of the desire of a WG for wide review?

I would hate to mandate it.  But making it an easy tool is good.

If we do the auto stuff and allow chairs/team to add, then everyone would subscribe.

If all emails indicate the end-date of the request, we could even have a living page of current requests.

Document:  Title + URL
Event:  (LCWD, FPWD, Review request…)
End-date:  XX-XX-XX
Source: (the WG)

… 

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 3:15 PM
> To: chaals@yandex-team.ru
> Cc: Arthur Barstow; Phillips, Addison; public-w3process@w3.org; 
> public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: 
> Comments on: W3C Process2015]
> 
> we desperately need a “this is a good time to review” list (‘life 
> events’ list, transitions, excl. opps, reviews opps., etc.)
> 
>> On Apr 6, 2015, at 13:58 , chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
>> 
>> I'll be forwarding this to the people who actually do things like 
>> this, in the hopes that helps. It would be really useful…
>> 
>> cheers
>> 
>> 06.04.2015, 22:55, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@gmail.com>:
>>> On 4/6/15 4:04 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote:
>>>> I agree with Chaals that FPWD is a good time to start the review process.
>>> 
>>> Me three and to facilitate the FPWD discovery part, several months 
>>> ago
>>> ([ab]) I proposed the Pub Team `automagically` announce FPWD 
>>> publications on [p-r-a] but that has never been done :-(.
>>> 
>>> -AB
>>> 
>>> [ab]
>>> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0065.

>>> h
>>> tml> [p-r-a]
>>> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-review-announce/>
>> 
>> --
>> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex 
>> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

>> 
> 
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> 
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Monday, 6 April 2015 22:38:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 6 April 2015 22:38:22 UTC