Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] from Arthur Barstow on 2014-09-08 (public-w3process@w3.org from September 2014)

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:40:15 -0400
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-ID: <540DF80F.4090406@gmail.com>

On 9/8/14 2:12 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> I will support Jeff's assertion that your comments regarding the 
> current state of WHATWG's URL specification were inaccurate.

Sorry but I don't understand what I said that is not accurate so I would 
appreciate it, if you would please clarify.

> Can you provide a link which describes to what normative reference the 
> Progress Events specification proved to be problematic and why?

I think the changes made for the Draft PR in 
<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/progress/rev/e42aba3b2853> identifies the WHATWG 
references that had to be changed. As for the "why" here, if I 
understand what your after, I believe the gist was "make these changes 
or no PR/REC" ;-).

-AB

Received on Monday, 8 September 2014 18:40:45 UTC