- From: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:52:43 -0400
- To: public-w3process@w3.org, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
On September 2, 2014 at 2:27:43 AM, Daniel Glazman (daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com) wrote: > On 02/09/2014 08:22, Marcos Caceres wrote: > Then you'll have the same problem with ISO and other Standard Bodies, > de jure or de facto, that did fork specs 'in extenso' in the past and > will do it again in the future because they feel they need it. More > importantly, you'll be doing one mistake W3C did in the past. We can cross that bridge when we get to it. Right now, stopping the W3C from copy/pasting the WHATWG specs is what matters. -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 15:53:10 UTC