- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:14:31 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 11/23/14 12:41 PM, Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > If this is in violation of the Member Agreement, I would have > expected someone to make that point during the AC review of the > WebApps charter. IANAL so if this is a real current concern, we > should loop in Wendy, PSIG, and/or members own legal staff for > guidance. Any issues with the Member agreement are limited to usages of a spec in a way not permitted by the W3C Document License. So there would be never any issues with W3C introducing a new license; only issues if people don't honor such a license - which seems to be the concerns that Anne has raised. Hence, it would not come up in the AC review of the WebApps charter.
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 13:14:39 UTC