Action Items for Process

Chaals,
The Telcon participants decided that we needed to get the PSIG review started as soon as possible, and that since we had proposed text for 7.7.1 (from me) that we should send that to the PSIG to begin their review. I believe that issues that concerned you are either editorial (on the language of the various paragraphs) or topics that are best discussed by PSIG (such whether any substantive changes can be allowed without changing the existing patent commitments). Therefore, these can be fixed based on comments from PSIG (or later editorial updates).

Could you please send an updated draft of what you propose for section 2.2 Team. There was agreement that

1.      You can make the team section is simpler

2.      The roles of the identified Team members, (Director, CEO)  will be in document body, not team section

3.      A simplified description of what W3C is will appear either as a separate item in 2 or in the 2.2 section
For example, "W3C is not currently incorporated. For legal contracts, W3C is represented by a set of "Host" institutions. Within W3C, the Host institutions are governed by joint sponsorship contracts; the Hosts themselves are not W3C Members. As of this document the Host institutions are: Beihang University, the European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics (ERCIM), Keio University, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). "

[I copied (and modified) the existing Note text in 2.2. I am nor at all sure the the word, "currently" is needed because if W3C incorporates, the Process Document is likely to need revision anyway. I think the rest of the material up to, "As of this document ..." seems to state things that do hold and should be identified.]

Steve Z