W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > November 2014

Re: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 08:05:31 -0600
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
Message-Id: <84973523-09E4-4011-A4C7-F49F8B2AA1C2@w3.org>
To: chaals@yandex-team.ru

On Nov 6, 2014, at 5:31 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:

> 
> 
> 04.11.2014, 23:08, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>:
>> On Oct 8, 2014, at 6:09 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>  In the spirit of facilitating and increasing the likelihood of early and wide document reviews, a number of people in thread [1] voiced support for creating a Public list the Publications team would use to announce publications of FPWDs, LCWDs, 2014-preCRs and CRs. This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to create such a list and for the Publications team to use it when these types of documents are published.
>>> 
>>>  If anyone has any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by Oct 15.
>>> 
>>>  Assuming this CfC `passes`, a secondary issue is the name of the list. I am indifferent and offer these possibilities: public-{pubs,publications}; other suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
>> 
>> Hi Art,
>> 
>> Here's a rudimentary UI to make it easier for chairs and team contacts to send these review notices:
>>  http://www.w3.org/2014/11/getreview/
>> 
>> Would something like this be useful?
> 
> Very, but it *really* needs to cover normal Working Drafts.


Does that mean someone can request review "any time they want" or they are expected to request review "for every WG"? I assume the former.

Ian

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 14:05:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:12 UTC