W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Require security review before FPWD

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:02:32 +0000
Cc: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-Id: <3BFFF5E8-05AE-4F7A-907A-DA8BC2933024@apple.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>

On Nov 3, 2014, at 15:22 , Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> Requiring all documents between FPWD and CR to include a status of various reviews would indeed be a good thing.  Doing so would reinforce the message that such activities be done early without unduly slowing down the process.
> I don't think that this should be limited to security.  PLH listed[1] a few other areas that should be considered.

Nor me.  I actually think privacy is at least as much, if not more of, a nightmare for the W3C.  Accessibility, i18n are two others that come to mind.

>> David Singer
>> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Oct/0205.html

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 16:03:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:12 UTC