W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Draft Replacement Text for Section 7.7.1 Errata Management

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 23:22:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsW8eETgZu07mD=P+YbRsLM61j7iZ0PyF1v20uUP9NWE4Vrnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Stephen Zilles wrote:
> A Working Group should keep their Recommendations up-to-date as errors
are reported by readers and implementers.
> Such error reports should be processed no less frequently than quarterly
and errata should be placed in the Recommendation.

Probably worth noting that things which are determined to not be errata
don't have to go into the document (unless clarification is helpful) ...

"As applicable" comes to mind
Possibly
"If it is valid"

> An erratum is resolved by an informative,
> “proposed” correction generated by the Working Group  A correction
becomes a normative part of the

You're missing punctuation between "Working Group" and "A".

> Recommendation by the process for Revising a Recommendation described in
the next section.
Received on Sunday, 2 November 2014 06:22:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:12 UTC