W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules

From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 12:42:09 -0700
Message-ID: <54553791.7080607@linux.intel.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>

On 2014-11-01 01:40, David Singer wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 19:07 , Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/31/14 10:23 AM, JC Verdié wrote:
>>> I support that in the case of the two-people conflict occurs, we can live with that until the next election and *not* trigger a special election, but when the regular election arrives, one of them will have to give up with his TAG seat.
>> Agree.
>>
> I think we can certainly look at the case where the next regular election is ‘soon’.  I am trying to work out in my mind what that means.  The whole term?  Until the next annual election (seats are staggered, correct?)?  Special elections are a pain.

Next annual election seems good seems reasonable.  That's what happens 
for vacated elected seats.

>
>
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 19:42:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:12 UTC