- From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 12:42:09 -0700
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 2014-11-01 01:40, David Singer wrote: > On Oct 31, 2014, at 19:07 , Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 10/31/14 10:23 AM, JC Verdié wrote: >>> I support that in the case of the two-people conflict occurs, we can live with that until the next election and *not* trigger a special election, but when the regular election arrives, one of them will have to give up with his TAG seat. >> Agree. >> > I think we can certainly look at the case where the next regular election is ‘soon’. I am trying to work out in my mind what that means. The whole term? Until the next annual election (seats are staggered, correct?)? Special elections are a pain. Next annual election seems good seems reasonable. That's what happens for vacated elected seats. > > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > >
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 19:42:40 UTC