W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Proposed Process Change Regarding TAG Participation Rules

From: Daniel Appelquist <appelquist@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:31:20 -0700
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <345C9719-D6D5-4CF0-8597-109F7A3FDC42@gmail.com>
To: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
If we can get consensus on that and make that change, I’m in favor. I still believe we need more but I’m happy to argue for that at a later date.

Dan

> On 31 Oct 2014, at 12:53, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Oct 31, 2014 11:07 AM, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@gmail.com <mailto:art.barstow@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/31/14 10:23 AM, JC Verdié wrote:
> >>
> >> I support that in the case of the two-people conflict occurs, we can live with that until the next election and *not* trigger a special election, but when the regular election arrives, one of them will have to give up with his TAG seat.
> >
> >
> > Agree.
> >
> > -AB
> >
> Seems small and reasonable also helps with voter fatigue maybe, which is especially bad when in a "big" election turnout is already very low. :-)
> >
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 00:31:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:12 UTC