If we can get consensus on that and make that change, I’m in favor. I still believe we need more but I’m happy to argue for that at a later date. Dan > On 31 Oct 2014, at 12:53, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 31, 2014 11:07 AM, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@gmail.com <mailto:art.barstow@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 10/31/14 10:23 AM, JC Verdié wrote: > >> > >> I support that in the case of the two-people conflict occurs, we can live with that until the next election and *not* trigger a special election, but when the regular election arrives, one of them will have to give up with his TAG seat. > > > > > > Agree. > > > > -AB > > > Seems small and reasonable also helps with voter fatigue maybe, which is especially bad when in a "big" election turnout is already very low. :-) > >
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 00:31:51 UTC