On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > On 5/12/2014 4:15 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > A laudable goal. I think the TAG's event was not really "under W3C > auspices" - i.e., I don't see how it fits under the given guidelines, but > it was (imo) clearly a good thing. > > > I thought it was under W3C auspices because it was organized by the TAG. > The TAG is about "as W3C" as it gets. > Sure. But as an event, there's no category as laid out in the process doc this fits under. It was not directly sponsored by the W3C; it was just organized by the TAG members. Put it this way - let's say Tantek and I decided we wanted to make a "Moving the W3C Forward" open-ended unconference happen. Presuming the other AB members agreed with the idea, how would we go about doing this in order to clearly label as a W3C event? Seems to me it would need to be a Workshop, with all that that implies.
Received on Monday, 12 May 2014 20:51:07 UTC