W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > May 2014

W3C needs a Dashboard

From: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 12:10:14 +0200
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
CC: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <239D7A53E5B17B4BB20795A7977613A40207EB768CA1@CROEXCFWP04.gemalto.com>
Ian, Art, and all
I have been looking again at the dashboard wiki, and added a requirement to get the active specifications retrieved.
As an example, I have also restructured the page for the security activity https://www.w3.org/Security/wiki/Main_Page . this makes it as an entry point to all security related WG and IG. This page is light and may be the kind of structure we may need per activity.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
Sent: vendredi 4 avril 2014 18:37
To: Arthur Barstow
Cc: GALINDO Virginie; public-w3process
Subject: Re: W3C needs a Dashboard


On Apr 4, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:

> On 4/4/14 4:20 AM, ext GALINDO Virginie wrote:
>>  https://www.w3.org/wiki/Dashboard
>
> FYI, I added a new section re Priorities because ...
>
>
> On 4/3/14 1:31 PM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote:
>
> |  [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Headlights2013/SiteRedesign/Proposal
>
>
>
> That's a lot of details and a bit of a `boil the ocean` approach. (And
> I presume that since we are having this discussion no active resources
> are being applied to implement that proposal.)
>
> A high priority Use Case for me (as AC rep and Chair) is to have a single doc/service that provides a link to all Working Groups' {roadmap,dashboard,PubStatus,<what_ever_groups_call_it>} if they have one.

We have this page that shows which groups are publishing specs (and spec status):
 http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-groups-all

Ian

> As I said back in 2012 [1], a low-hanging-fruit solution would be to simply include such links to a canonical list of Working Groups such as [2], although adding the group's dashboard links to [3] would be better than what we have now which is nothing.
>
> -AB
>
> [1]
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-forum/2012OctDec/0154.htm
> l> [2] <http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/>
> [3] <https://www.w3.org/Member/Mail/>
>
>
>

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447




This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus
Received on Friday, 2 May 2014 10:10:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:10 UTC