W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html

From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:34:23 -0400
Message-ID: <539F2A9F.9060800@w3.org>
To: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>

On 6/16/2014 1:30 PM, Wayne Carr wrote:
>
> On 2014-06-16 08:43, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Jeff and Ralph asked me to clarify my expectations regarding point #1 
>> of the comments I submitted for [Proposal]:
>>
>> [[
>> 1. The comments from @SomeCommenter should be addressed (f.e.x. 
>> discussed and implemented where there is consensus) before the 
>> Director approves this proposed ProcDoc. Otherwise, the AB, as the 
>> Consortium's "process steward" sets a `bad example` for other groups 
>> that *are* required to address all Last Call comments.
>
> As I remember it, those comments weren't "Last Call" comments. There 
> were no comments in the second last call at all (in April), presumably 
> having been dealt with satisfactorily in the first last call.  Am I 
> misremembering this?

You remember correctly.

>
> I assume you are referring to comments that came in as part of the AC 
> review.  Those comments appear to me largely editorial and so can be 
> fixed as part of the usual process of considering the AC review and 
> not hold up approval.  Other comments may be new topics for the next 
> round of revisions. I don't remember any significant point of 
> disagreement.
>
>>
>> 2. As I understand it, the `transition plan` is the 5 points in 
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Mar/0019.html>. 
>> I think this plan is somewhat incomprehensible and should be 
>> clarified before the proposal is implemented. For instance, I can't 
>> tell which specific point(s?) apply to WebApps.
>>
>> 3.Work on a related Best Practices / FAQ should be started *before* 
>> the proposal is implemented.
>> ]]
>>
>> Since the [RfC] identifies [Proposal] as a "Last Call" document, I 
>> expect the process defined by [ProcDoc] applies.
>
> Last Call has been over for quite a while.
>
>>
>> (AFAIK, the comments from @SomeCommenter are not Public and I do not 
>> have permission to copy them to Public space.)
>>
>> -HTH, AB
>>
>> [RfC] 
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Mar/0019.html>
>> [Proposal] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html>
>> [ProcDoc] 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 16 June 2014 17:34:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:11 UTC