W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > June 2014

Re: AB size [Was: Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results]

From: Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié <jicheu@yahoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:12:43 +0200
Message-ID: <5395B2CB.1010002@yahoo.fr>
To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
CC: Yosuke Funahashi <yosuke@funahashi.cc>, public-w3process@w3.org, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Hi,

Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
>>> This is one of the reasons why I wrote a message that we should make
>>> the AB open. Some people sounded comfortable with keeping the AB
>>> small or current size, which I don't understand at all.
>>
>> For the record, I also support increasing the size of the AB.
> 
> For the record I still don't support notably increasing its size.

+1. I do not support increasing its size notably. May be jump to 11, 13,
but more would do more harm than good.

> 
>> Of course I also [again] support making it self-selective.
> 
> I do not support this either. Having an elected, representative AB
> allows AC reps to trust the people who represent them. This is why I
> think it is very important to have the AB selected in a manner that
> represents the desires of the AC as best possible.

+1


> 
> I do support moving as much as possible of what it does to the AC at
> large, or community groups, and making the AB's work as transparent as
> possible (this allows AC reps to check that the people they trust really
> *are* representing them).

+1




JC
Received on Monday, 9 June 2014 13:13:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:11 UTC