Re: Is strategic voting a problem? - was RE: Don't disclose election results

On Jun 6, 2014, at 8:42 , Yosuke Funahashi <yosuke@funahashi.cc> wrote:

> This is one of the reasons why I wrote a message that we should make the AB open. Some people sounded comfortable with keeping the AB small or current size, which I don't understand at all.

I think in general, once over a minimum size, the efficacy of a committee (and I mean committee, not working group etc.) is inversely proportional to size. For example, for classic boards, I think once you are over about a dozen, efficacy drops sharply.  There are many factors at play: it takes longer to listen to everyone (and one has to, even if people repeat things already said), and in a large group everyone feels it’s large enough that they don’t have to step up and be particularly active, and so on.

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 20:32:30 UTC