W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > June 2014

RE: Don't disclose election results

From: Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 16:49:46 +0000
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <96210A64A8AC40458F5180192EB9257431C3D954@XCH-PHX-101.sw.nos.boeing.com>
It's one thing for candidates to be privately informed, IF they want to know.  It's another thing for that information to be made public.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Glazman [mailto:daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 9:42 AM
> To: public-w3process@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Don't disclose election results
> 
> On 03/06/2014 18:18, Robin Berjon wrote:
> > Deanonymising might have made them feel
> > obliged to vote for that person. Sure enough a politician getting trounced
> can be tough, but you're trounced mostly by total strangers. If you've been
> > a part of this community and you get five votes, you'll feel trounced by
> your friends.
> 
> I think it is out of question to "deanonymize" votes. But I still
> think each candidate has the right to know how many votes he/she got
> and out of how many.
> 
> > So, please, let's not make the results transparent. There's plenty of
> *other* things we need to make the election more open. The first of them is
> that
> > non-AC candidates should be subscribed to the AC lists for the duration of
> the campaign.
> 
> Samsung's AB candidate was in that case, and I pinged IanJ to have
> him subscribed. FWIW, I think Huawei's AC-Rep posted their candidate's
> statement to the AC Forum because he was in that case too.
> 
> So I agree 100% with that.
> 
> </Daniel>
> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 16:50:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:10 UTC