- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 21:21:10 +0200
- To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: public-w3process@w3.org
On 02/06/2014 21:06, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: > I'd be happy to have the pattern data, but not the candidate names - i.e. anonymize them so we can't figure out who romped in, who scraped in, and who > was beaten out by a single vote - or only got 1. Then I disagree. Publishing anonymized data is not useful to people not drastically involved in W3C Process. I suggest then W3M shares *all* election data with the AB, in full confidentiality. I don't even know if it's already the case today or not, and that says something about the opaqueness of our electoral system... The AC would get, as I said earlier, number of votes globally and per candidate and that would be enough IMHO. (please note that even if the votes are ballots, the results are counted per person) </Daniel>
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 19:21:36 UTC