- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:47:48 -0400
- To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>, "ab@w3.org" <ab@w3.org>
- CC: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 7/17/14 11:21 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote: >> * ab - use this existing list but change its scope to only be used for *sensitive* topics that are _soooo_ sensitive they can't be discussed with Members >> >> * member-ab - use this for day-to-day AB business such as agendas and such. Any Member should be should be able to subscribe to this list. This would eliminate the need to cc w3c-ac-forum and provide a good way for AC reps to follow and/or contribute to discussions. >> >> * public-ab - literally, a Public list the Public can use to talk to the AB and vice versa. > Your proposal would work for me. :-) > I suspect the process list would be merged with the public list, or did you have another view ? That would be fine with me, although I don't have a strong preference. > After 6 months of usage, we may revisit that, as we would be able to see if the member-ab conversation could go public, and we could measure the usefulness interactions we get on public-ab (I mean with person that are not on the member-ab list). That seems reasonable to me. (BTW, I was quoted in [1] as having a position of "all things must be public". That's not accurate and I don't think I have ever said that.) -Thanks, AB [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Jul/0035.html>
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 15:48:18 UTC