[minutes] 19 February 2014 Revising W3C Process Community Group Teleconference
Agenda for Chapter 7 Task Force Telcon, 8AM Pacific, 11AM Eastern, 3 February
Analysis of redundancy of text on Notes in draft Chapter 7
Clarifying the steps from CR to Rec
Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review]
- Ian Jacobs (Monday, 17 February)
- Charles McCathie Nevile (Monday, 17 February)
- Stephen Zilles (Monday, 17 February)
- Ian Jacobs (Monday, 17 February)
- Ian Jacobs (Monday, 17 February)
- Charles McCathie Nevile (Monday, 17 February)
- Stephen Zilles (Monday, 17 February)
- Ian Jacobs (Saturday, 15 February)
- Stephen Zilles (Saturday, 15 February)
- Ian Jacobs (Saturday, 15 February)
- Stephen Zilles (Saturday, 15 February)
- Ian Jacobs (Friday, 14 February)
- Charles McCathie Nevile (Friday, 14 February)
- Charles McCathie Nevile (Friday, 14 February)
- Ian Jacobs (Friday, 14 February)
- Charles McCathie Nevile (Friday, 14 February)
- Charles McCathie Nevile (Friday, 14 February)
- Wayne Carr (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Ian Jacobs (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Wayne Carr (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Ian Jacobs (Tuesday, 11 February)
Minutes and summary of 3 February 2014 Chapter 7 Revision Task Force teleconference
New chapter 7 draft
New draft
New draft - please review
New draft, with love...
Please make the "Positive Work Environment Task Force" statement a living doc
Suggested edits [Was: Analysis of redundancy of text on Notes in draft Chapter 7]
w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD
w3process-ISSUE-85 (editorial changes): Make editorial changes a may or should? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
w3process-ISSUE-86 (end of review?): When should the PR review end ? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
w3process-ISSUE-86 (end of review?): When should the PR review end? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
w3process-ISSUE-87 (coming to CR): How to ensure you got wide review to enter CR [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
Last message date: Monday, 24 February 2014 13:59:38 UTC