public-w3process@w3.org from February 2014 by author

Charles McCathie Nevile

Re: New chapter 7 draft (Friday, 21 February)
New draft (Thursday, 20 February)
Re: Suggested edits [Was: Analysis of redundancy of text on Notes in draft Chapter 7] (Tuesday, 18 February)
New chapter 7 draft (Tuesday, 18 February)
Re: Analysis of redundancy of text on Notes in draft Chapter 7 (Monday, 17 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Monday, 17 February)
Re: New draft - please review (Monday, 17 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Monday, 17 February)
Re: New draft, with love... (Sunday, 16 February)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-86 (end of review?): When should the PR review end? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Sunday, 16 February)
New draft, with love... (Friday, 14 February)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-85 (editorial changes): Make editorial changes a may or should? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Friday, 14 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Friday, 14 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Friday, 14 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Friday, 14 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Friday, 14 February)
Re: New draft - please review (Monday, 10 February)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD (Monday, 10 February)
Re: New draft - please review (Wednesday, 5 February)
New draft - please review (Tuesday, 4 February)
Re: Agenda for Chapter 7 Task Force Telcon, 8AM Pacific, 11AM Eastern, 3 February (Monday, 3 February)
Clarifying the steps from CR to Rec (Monday, 3 February)
Re: Agenda for Chapter 7 Task Force Telcon, 8AM Pacific, 11AM Eastern, 3 February (Monday, 3 February)

Coralie Mercier

[minutes] 19 February 2014 Revising W3C Process Community Group Teleconference (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: Please make the "Positive Work Environment Task Force" statement a living doc (Tuesday, 4 February)
Minutes and summary of 3 February 2014 Chapter 7 Revision Task Force teleconference (Tuesday, 4 February)

Daniel Glazman

Re: New chapter 7 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)

Ian Jacobs

Re: Suggested edits [Was: Analysis of redundancy of text on Notes in draft Chapter 7] (Monday, 17 February)
Suggested edits [Was: Analysis of redundancy of text on Notes in draft Chapter 7] (Monday, 17 February)
Analysis of redundancy of text on Notes in draft Chapter 7 (Monday, 17 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Monday, 17 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Monday, 17 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Monday, 17 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Saturday, 15 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Saturday, 15 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Friday, 14 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Friday, 14 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Wednesday, 12 February)
Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Tuesday, 11 February)

Jeff Jaffe

Re: New chapter 7 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: New chapter 7 draft (Tuesday, 18 February)
Re: New draft - please review (Monday, 17 February)
Re: New draft, with love... (Sunday, 16 February)
Re: New draft - please review (Monday, 10 February)
Re: New draft - please review (Friday, 7 February)

Ralph Swick

Re: New draft (Monday, 24 February)

Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

w3process-ISSUE-87 (coming to CR): How to ensure you got wide review to enter CR [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Friday, 14 February)
w3process-ISSUE-86 (end of review?): When should the PR review end? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Friday, 14 February)
w3process-ISSUE-85 (editorial changes): Make editorial changes a may or should? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Friday, 7 February)

Stephen Zilles

Re: New chapter 7 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Monday, 17 February)
Re: New draft - please review (Monday, 17 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Monday, 17 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Saturday, 15 February)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-87 (coming to CR): How to ensure you got wide review to enter CR [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Saturday, 15 February)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-86 (end of review?): When should the PR review end ? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Saturday, 15 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Saturday, 15 February)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD (Monday, 10 February)
Agenda for Chapter 7 Task Force Telcon, 8AM Pacific, 11AM Eastern, 3 February (Sunday, 2 February)

Steve Zilles

RE: New draft - please review (Monday, 10 February)

Wayne Carr

Re: w3process-ISSUE-86 (end of review?): When should the PR review end? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Saturday, 15 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Wednesday, 12 February)
Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (Tuesday, 11 February)

Last message date: Monday, 24 February 2014 13:59:38 UTC