- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:09:37 -0800
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2014 16:10:04 UTC
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > > In terms of the CC0 license, my impression is that the AC is not there > yet, although clearly some in the W3C community support that notion. And > personally I'm not convinced that it is a good idea since CC0 advocates > have been explicit that they like the idea that they could create > derivative specs elsewhere (which would lead to fragmentation). > If the only thing keeping development of a standard in the W3C is the copyright license on the specification, then the W3C is doomed.
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2014 16:10:04 UTC