W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > August 2014

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:19:16 +0200
Message-ID: <54001B64.4000202@gmx.de>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
CC: public-w3process@w3.org, Daniel Appelquist <appelquist@gmail.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
On 2014-08-29 01:50, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 14:25 -0400, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> I'm also interested in the rationale here.
> The rational is the same as Encoding, or DOM: W3C seeks clear
> Royalty-Free licensing commitments from as many key stakeholders as we
> can bring together, as well as stable content for normative references
> (a consideration by the Director [1] as part of the Recommendation
> Track).
> ...

Philippe, my understanding was that there is one more reason for this, 
and the spec even says so:

"W3C-specific note: This specification documents current RFC 3986 and 
RFC 3987 handling in contemporary Web browser implementations. As a 
consequence, this specification is not compatible with those RFCs. It is 
published for the purpose of providing a stable reference for the HTML5 
specification and reflecting current Web browser HTML5 implementations. 
The W3C Technical Architecture Group expects to continue the work on the 
URL specification and produce a future version that will attempt to 
re-align the URL specification with an updated version of RFC 3986 while 
preserving interoperability."

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 29 August 2014 06:20:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:11 UTC