W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > August 2014

Re: voting simple illustration

From: <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:11:27 -0400
Message-ID: <20140825231127.6303831.88834.2510@gmail.com>
To: public-w3process@w3.org
> I have been involved in elections with quorum requirements.
> Do we (w3c) have any now?

ITS did [1].
WCAG has a "chair defined quorum" line.
XForms markup thought it had a.m operative quorum requirement, but I can't find it. **
QAWG draft did [2].
SocialWeb [3] did (not sure what they are) 
WebCGM (?) and WS and Mobile Web Best Practices, and TTML all seemed to fail some quorum requirements, WAI also seemed to fail 

** we need to demand charters link for date versioned process documents!!

‎
> Even if we did, then some of the cases are covered by a simple failure to list a preference for some candidates (r.g. the quorum requirement that, to be elected, one has to receive yes votes from >Y% of the voting pool).

[1]‎ http://www.w3.org/2004/11/i18n-recharter/its-charter#voting
[2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/01/qawgpd-20030103.html#sub1-2
[3] http://www.w3.org/wiki/SocialWebTeleconferences
Received on Monday, 25 August 2014 23:11:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:11 UTC