Re: w3process-ISSUE-68 (Ch7-DogFood-The-New-CR): Rather than implement it across-the-board, perhaps it would be useful to have a "candidate" period [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:33:51 +1100, Revising W3C Process Community Group  
Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> w3process-ISSUE-68 (Ch7-DogFood-The-New-CR): Rather than implement it  
> across-the-board, perhaps it would be useful to have a "candidate"   
> period [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

This is a duplicate of ISSUE-39 which is already open. I propose to close  
this one.

cheers

> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/68
>
> Raised by: Arthur Barstow
> On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)
>
> See:
>
> [[
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Nov/0068.html>
>
> Assuming the proposal moves forward, rather than implement it
> across-the-board, perhaps it would be useful to have a "candidate"
> period to work out the kinks. It might also be useful to limit the trial
> to a small set of WGs that agree to test the proposal.
> ]]
>
>
>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 20:14:55 UTC