Re: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal] from Arthur Barstow on 2013-11-07 (public-w3process@w3.org from November 2013)

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 08:22:11 -0500
To: "ext Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
CC: Advisory Board <ab@w3.org>, W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <527B9403.4050307@nokia.com>

On 11/7/13 1:48 AM, ext Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> I think we understand that this does put more of a responsibility on chairs, but hopefully more freedom for them to customize and optimize the workings of a group to meet its real constraints

Sorry for being so dense here, but would you please elaborate a bit on 
how you see the current ProcDoc somehow prevents or precludes this from 
happening (now)?

-Thanks, AB

Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 13:23:44 UTC