- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:47:04 -0400
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- CC: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 3/20/2012 12:04 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le mardi 20 mars 2012 à 11:58 -0400, Jeff Jaffe a écrit : >> My (rose colored) interpretation of what you are saying is that CSS 3 >> has the right paradigm, but they are choosing to implement it >> imperfectly. That is a culture and practice appraisal which should be >> fixed within this right paradigm. >> >> I would not prefer to create a different paradigm which could be equally >> applied imperfectly. > I'm not sure what paradigm you're referring to :) Modularization. > My propositions so far > have stayed clear of changing the W3C Process, not because I think we > shouldn't change it no matter what, but just because I have the changes > that have most impact don't derive from changes to the Process. > > But independently of the W3C Process, the changes I'm suggesting require > a non-trivial amount of work to get them considered, and then hopefully > adopted by WGs. Some of the changes require changes to our internal > policies that will also need to reviewed and approved. > > Dom >
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 17:47:17 UTC