W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > November 2011

AW: Prioritisation

From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:22:32 +0100
To: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-Id: <63930C77AA7F3A4C8C7D5D7F2BB2FFEA7CFA443F33@QEO40072.de.t-online.corp>
Hi Chaals,

So which specific steps do you envision to continue here?

-- Kai

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:chaals@opera.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. November 2011 20:10
> An: public-w3process@w3.org
> Betreff: Prioritisation
> 
> Dom had said...
> > Kai said
> >> Jumping ahead to some later mails, I support Charles' view to
> >> tackle the issues by priority.
> 
> Note that I didn't say we should prioritise first. I explicitly believe
> that we will discover what is important, because people will choose to
> work on it. Which saves us arguing about the priority of work that
> hasn't
> really got underway yet.
> 
> > That sounds like a good idea in principle, but if there are some
> > interdependencies between issues, this could get messy.
> 
> Sure. I don't think that's a big issue, it just means that for some
> cases
> we will have to do some complex work before we're likely to achieve
> much.
> 
> In changing W3C's process we need to get agreement from the W3C staff
> and
> membership (it belongs to them). Without clear proposals, explained
> well
> to AC representatives and the lawyers who will be watching over some of
> their shoulders, it becomes less likely that we get such agreement.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > I think it would be useful for someone to go through the list of
> points,
> > and try to identify:
> > * the actual (presumably negative) impact of the said point on WGs
> (or
> > on specific roles within WGs)
> > * the document that creates that pain point (could be the process
> > document, pubrules, the transition request document, or some
> > undocumented convention)
> 
> Doing this for issues in tracker seems likely to give us a workable
> method
> of handling issues that we can follow and work with.
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> --
> Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
>      je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
> http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com


Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 13:24:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 9 October 2013 23:56:57 UTC