- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 10:29:17 -0700
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Although facet does mean something else in the classification community: "A facet comprises "clearly defined, mutually exclusive, and collectively exhaustive aspects, properties or characteristics of a class or specific subject".[1] It's not just any attribute, but is a specific selection of attributes that will be applied uniformly across a domain. Typical facets are things like matter, place, and time. I would hate to see the term used for general attributes. kc [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faceted_classification#cite_note-1 On 5/6/15 9:37 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 5/6/15 11:22 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> I meant: >> >> Type = Entity Type >> Facet = Relationship/Attribute Type > > Clear and consistent with my understanding. > > Thanks! > > Kingsley >> >> Martin >> >> -------------------------------------------------------- >> martin hepp >> e-business & web science research group >> universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen >> >> e-mail: martin.hepp@unibw.de >> phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 >> fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 >> www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) >> http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) >> skype: mfhepp >> twitter: mfhepp >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 06 May 2015, at 15:30, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/6/15 4:50 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: >>>> Dear Guha: >>>> Thanks for this important guideline! One question - could you please >>>> clarify what you mean with: >>>> >>>>> 2. It must have at least 10m weekly users. Preferably 100m >>>> Does this refer to the number of times a type or facet is relevant >>>> for a search engine query? Or the total number of human visitors to >>>> the Web sites that implement the conceptual elements? >>>> >>>> Martin >>> Martin, >>> >>> I am being picky about terminology use, but for the sole purpose of >>> communications clarity. Thus, aren't the following synonyms: Facet, >>> Feature, Characteristic, Aspect, Attribute, Quality? If so, the >>> "Facet or Type" comment above is a little confusing, hence my >>> question [1][2][3]. >>> >>> Wondering where I am headed with this? Fundamentally, it's all about >>> clearly defining faceted browsing [4] which is ultimately impacted by >>> Schema.org term usage especially in regards to determining usage and >>> actual utility etc.. >>> >>> Links: >>> >>> [1] http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/feature >>> [2] http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/facet >>> [3] http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/Attribute >>> [4] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2015Apr/0075.html >>> -- LOD list post about Faceted Browsing. >>> >>> >>> Kingsley >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 06 May 2015, at 03:59, Guha <guha@google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> There has been a request to clarify when something should go into >>>>> an extension versus when something should go into the core. Here is >>>>> a first stab at clarifying that. >>>>> >>>>> For something to be in the core, the following conditions must be >>>>> satisfied: >>>>> >>>>> 1. There must be at least a 1000 sites that will use it. Preferably >>>>> 10,000+ >>>>> 2. It must have at least 10m weekly users. Preferably 100m >>>>> 3. The vocabulary must be relatively compact. Less than 20 terms. >>>>> >>>>> Of course, these are not hard constraints. We also recognize that >>>>> vocabularies evolve and more usage than planned might happen. We >>>>> expect terms or entire vocabularies to move from the extensions to >>>>> core and vice versa. >>>>> >>>>> This is a start of the discussion. >>>>> >>>>> guha >>>>> >>>> ----------------------------------- >>>> martin hepp http://www.heppnetz.de >>>> mhepp@computer.org @mfhepp >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Kingsley Idehen >>> Founder & CEO >>> OpenLink Software >>> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >>> Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com >>> Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >>> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen >>> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about >>> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen >>> Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2015 17:29:50 UTC