W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > March 2015

schema:status very narrow definition

From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:49:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK4ZFVE8k=ua3pMU3wskcOD73gW9g5FB6cyCqwTm3yZ3bHqe=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hi all

I'm wondering about
being used only on

This property "status" has various definitions (if any) in various
see http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/terms?q=status

People often take for granted that there is a "status" property in Dublin
Core, and put a dcterms:status in their metadata without double checkng -
but there is none.

foaf:status has the very specific definition of user status, mood etc

dbpedia-owl:status does not give any definition ...

bibo:status seems the most reasonable basis for extending the semantics of
schema:status (but bibo does not eat completely its dog food, using
vs:term_status internally)

Proposal : add schema:status to schema:CreativeWork description, and change
its definition to a more general one along the one of bibo.

Note that this will not solve the issue of various meanings of "status" in
see http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/terms?q=status&tag=Biology

That's what you get with a unique namespace policy :)


*Bernard Vatant*
Vocabularies & Data Engineering
Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
Skype : bernard.vatant
35 boulevard de Strasbourg 75010 Paris
Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 09:49:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 30 March 2015 09:49:56 UTC