W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > March 2015

Re: why Vehicle subClassOf Product ? (also: Commercial, Economic)

From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:34:56 +0100
Message-ID: <55154E70.8010508@wwelves.org>
To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@unibw.de>, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
CC: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 03/26/2015 05:47 PM, Martin Hepp wrote:
> Aaron: I think we are in agreement regarding the conclusion: Because MTEs are slippery ground, at least currently, we should keep Vehicle where it is now.
> 
> I also agree that it would be very desirable if the sponsors of schema.org could properly support and document the use of MTEs. That is in the long run better than gradually moving more and more types beneath Product; and we also need MTEs for ProductModel cases anyway.

Thank you Martin for creating this issue on Github and thank you Jarno
and Aaron for your helpful feedback!

https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/404


Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 12:35:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 March 2015 12:35:12 UTC