W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2015

Re: A versioning model for schema.org

From: jean-delahousse <delahousse.jean@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:55:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAO+52yXboEgiXYyAHGsjhD-wpHUZkQzyA7CAAUmfHWTGOOGthQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Thanks for all those useful resources
Jean
Le jeu. 29 janv. 2015 à 19:44, Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:03 AM, jean-delahousse <
> delahousse.jean@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thoughts:
>>
>> PROV(enance) ontology could be very useful to describe the changes and
>> link them to  related "issues" as well as formal decision which validate
>> the change.
>>
>
> In terms of linking between versions of the schema, these W3C PROV
> predicates may be useful:
>
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-primer/
>
> prov:wasRevisionOf
> prov:wasDerivedFrom
> prov:wasRevisionOf
>
> From OWL and dcterms:
>
> owl:versionIRI
> owl:priorVersion
> dc:isVersionOf
>
>
> From XKOS (for more granular relations between (versions of) vocabularies):
>
> * https://github.com/linked-statistics/xkos/blob/master/xkos.ttl
> * http://www.ddialliance.org/Specification/RDF/XKOS
>
> xkos:supersedes
> xkos:precedes
> xkos:succeeds
> [...]
>
> There's likely some insight here:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2014237/what-are-the-best-practices-for-versioning-xml-schemas
>
> It may be helpful to ask a question here: http://answers.semanticweb.com/
>
> *
> http://answers.semanticweb.com/search/?q=versioning&Submit=search&t=question
> *
> http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/453/how-to-implement-semantic-data-versioning
> *
> http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/2815/how-do-i-knowmodel-the-applied-version-of-an-ontology-specification
> *
> http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/3499/ontology-version-control-systems
> *
> http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/3677/what-provenance-vocabulary-should-we-use
> (2011)
>
> The Talis Changeset vocabulary does seem very approachable:
>
> * http://vocab.org/changeset/schema.html
>
>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:55:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:55:46 UTC