W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Some interesting things that show up when using a reasoner to classify schema.org

From: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:37:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CADE8KM78EqC=TA8CQCiRDTuAuMHh_bGoq8sPOBY7Je2dDSs5iw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Would you care to open up sdo-zuul?
On Jan 28, 2015 9:29 AM, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> On 28 January 2015 at 14:21, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:50 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
> > <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> 2. A proper extension mechanism for both types and properties, and
> >> guidance on how and when to use the mechanism. This is why I tried hard
> to
> >> define the additionalType property proposal as a generic mechanism.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > A better extension mechanism would help us experiment before committing
> to a
> > solution for some of the thornier modeling issues.
>
> Slight tangent but I tried to list out the various different things we
> have that serve as 'extension mechanisms' in
> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/284 - maybe 5 of 6
> components. Agree that a clearer story there would benefit everyone.
>
> Dan
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 15:38:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 28 January 2015 15:38:11 UTC