Re: Some interesting things that show up when using a reasoner to classify schema.org from Vicki Tardif Holland on 2015-01-28 (public-vocabs@w3.org from January 2015)

From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:21:18 -0500
To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Cc: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAOr1obE8qqaCBJod2bBjUPCEro-5-o+WE8DL4mg5ceGuKAu6ww@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:50 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org <
martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:

> 2. A proper extension mechanism for both types and properties, and
> guidance on how and when to use the mechanism. This is why I tried hard to
> define the additionalType property proposal as a generic mechanism.


+1

A better extension mechanism would help us experiment before committing to
a solution for some of the thornier modeling issues.

- Vicki

Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com

Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 14:21:45 UTC