W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Wednesday morning for Schema.org/Actions BOF? [was Re: The Vocabulary, Schema.org governance, etc.]

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:39:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=7mhDR+arLGYPEJMdtBZUqxOy6QHqE1zANZbQ1_dpdmLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Guha <guha@google.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, W3C Vocabularies <public-vocabs@w3.org>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
On 29 September 2014 16:18, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

> On 09/29/2014 05:16 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> I don't see anything about this meeting on the TPAC page for
>> proposals for this session.  Is this part of the process just being
>> skipped?
>>
>> As well, will an agenda be prepared for this session?  There are a
>> number of things on the boundary between W3c and schema.org that I
>> think should be discussed.  Some of these might be relevant to this
>> session, but others might not.   An agenda might help preventing
>> the session from going off into things that are not relevant to the
>> purpose of the meeting.
>>
>
> We're waiting for a "yes" response from someone from the schema.org
> community, and then I'll add a page ASAP. Ian has already approved
> internally for reserving us a session.
>
> And yes, we'd want to corroborate on an agenda with everyone.

Would it be open to members of the public?

Dan
Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 15:39:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC