W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: The Vocabulary, Schema.org governance, etc.

From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 19:50:28 +0530
Message-ID: <CAMXe=SrGPWXfJzNuTqnKEKO804ptZTorwMWg_aBJDTaBt_Y+4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hellow Peter

thanks for sharing insights

makes sense, but......

 not sure I can see schema.org purely as vertical

would have thought that vertical is 'domain oriented''
while horizontal is it applies across domains


that may depend on a given worldview perhaps ? :-)


On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Hi Renato,
> The W3C in particular did not want to take on vertical vocabulary projects
> in the past. Tim B-L emphasized in multiple talks that the W3C would like
> to focus on developing ontology languages, and let industry develop
> vertical solutions. (To me the examples you mentioned such as SKOS and
> PROV are part of the language infrastructure.)
> schema.org is such a vertical solution based on the needs of large web
> consumers.
> Best,
> Peter
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 14:20:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC