W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: September Update on Sports

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:15:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=45Q73Ed6NVK=dV0Mj5U0v+wXLd=EzPWUsm0L4muvY2JA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
On 24 September 2014 19:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> Intriguing.
>
> Is there going to be a non-trivial theory of sports.  For example, will
> there be sub-sports?

At this point, I suggest just an URL attachment point for well known
identifiers. Baby steps...

Dan

> peter
>
>
> On 09/24/2014 11:19 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 24 Sep 2014 18:48, "Vicki Tardif Holland" <vtardif@google.com
>> <mailto:vtardif@google.com>> wrote:
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net
>> <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >> A "namedPosition" property would be fine, as long as the range is not
>> schema:Text. IMO, something like this should use URIs for such enumerated
>> values. Schema.org always allows falling back to text.
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > I am looking at http://sdo-sports.appspot.com/OrganizationRole. The
>> range
>> is URL or text. I agree that URIs should be used to have any hope of
>> understanding what the value means.
>>
>> Yes, I'm also updating 'sport' property similarly.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 19:16:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC