W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: The Vocabulary, Schema.org governance, etc.

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 07:19:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbdEo0=i4Hz5UgTBc7ZLtj_bcFeDojwxCiU+NTk2aUKM=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org Vocabs" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>, Guha <guha@google.com>
Activity Streams 2.0 and the related Actions proposals are currently in
front of the the w3c social web working group for consideration.
On Sep 24, 2014 7:14 AM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>

> What are AS 2.0 and Acdtions?  Pointers to proposals or discussions would
> be helpful to figure out what is (going to be) going on here.
> peter
> On 09/24/2014 04:21 AM, Harry Halpin wrote:
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Basically, people in the WG that while of course everyone is welcome
>> as observers, some felt it would be unfair to give special treatment
>> to non-members, particularly as people in the WG pointed out they
>> could just join the WG and become members.
>> That being said, many people wanted a joint f2f between schema.org and
>> Social WG members, in particular given the proposed direction of AS
>> 2.0 and Acdtions, so we're working with Ian and TPAC to find a
>> suitable time/place for a BOF over schema.org and Social WG.
>> Would Wednesday during the open-space session suit everyone?
>> Thursday has a number of conflicts for people in more than one WG
>> during TPAC.
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:20:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC